{"id":798,"date":"2020-02-01T00:10:46","date_gmt":"2020-02-01T00:10:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/?p=798"},"modified":"2020-02-01T00:10:46","modified_gmt":"2020-02-01T00:10:46","slug":"google-is-messing-with-search-results-and-it-can-be-proven","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/google-is-messing-with-search-results-and-it-can-be-proven\/","title":{"rendered":"Google is messing with search results and it can be proven"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/boygeniusreport.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/10\/google-search.jpg?quality=98&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1564\" width=\"1564\" height=\"987\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">When somebody types in the search term into Google, for example, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jackpotcapital.eu\/\"><span class=\"s2\">Jackpot Capital casino download<\/span><\/a>, the person expects to get search results back that are relevant to their search. \u00a0 In an ideal world, the actual link to the actual downloadable file for the Jackpot Capital casino download should be the first item. But in reality, it will, in a majority of instances, end up within the first 5 &#8211; 10 search results.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">But what if nothing came back?\u00a0 If you knew, for a fact, without a single doubt in your mind that there was something in the vast internet world that matched those keywords, and nothing came back, what would you think?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Well, I have found such a search result.\u00a0 The reason why this is big is that it proves without a single doubt in anybody&#8217;s mind that Google had already put into place the ability to selectively not show certain keywords.\u00a0 Now imagine this, it is the 2020 Presidential Debate, and one of the questions is \u201cIs Hunter Biden&#8217;s son being paid $85k per month by a Chinese company when Hunter Biden has no experience, considered a form of bribery?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Maybe somebody hasn&#8217;t been paying attention and has no idea what this question is talking about.\u00a0 So they type into Google +\u201dHunter Biden&#8221; +China +85k and nothing comes back. Zero, zilch, nada. Would anybody believe that there are no search results?\u00a0 What would Google say, \u201cOoops, we have a software issue and we are looking into it.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">But my test results will prove Google precreated the software code to allow Google at any point, any time to across the board, return zero search results for a valid search query.\u00a0 In other words, Google has all of the pieces in place to interfere in the 2020 US Presidential election, and videos have been released that show that Google has every intention of using this code.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>My personal testing of Google&#8217;s search engine<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">I actually came across this \u201cbug&#8221; \/ \u201cfeature&#8221; back in June 2019 when I had to write a letter to somebody and I needed to reference a previously published article.\u00a0 It is now January 30, 2020, and today I have been able to recreate these search results.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">For all of these results, I expected at least a page of search results involving news articles.\u00a0 This is the results I got back.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 1<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Keywords: +child +pornography +Muslim<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Expected results: News articles that talked about child pornography involving Muslims.\u00a0 Since there was a big case involving a child, sexual abuse, and grooming in London, England, I should have gotten back some results.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Google Results: Nothing &#8212; \u201cYour search &#8211; +child +pornography +muslim &#8211; did not match any documents.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 2<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: +child +pornography +Christian<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Google Results: News articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 3:<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: +child +pornography +Jewish<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Google Results:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u201cNo results found for +child +pornography +jewish.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Results for child pornography Jewish (without punctuation &#8211; Learn more):\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 4:<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: child pornography Muslim<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Google Results: Nothing<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 5:\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: child pornography Christian<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Google results: About 16,300,000 results (0.44 seconds)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 6:\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: child pornography Jewish<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Google Results: About 7,240,000 results (0.48 seconds)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 7:\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: pornography Muslim<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Google Results: About 38,000,000 results (0.34 seconds)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 8<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: pornography Christian<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Google Results: About 45,100,000 results (0.43 seconds)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 9:\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: pornography Jewish<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Google Results: About 3,320,000 results (0.59 seconds)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 10:<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">For this test I change to the browser Opera and I change to the search engine \u201cduckduckgo&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: child pornography muslim<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Duckduckgo Results: News articles were returned (as expected).\u00a0 Duckduckgo does not give a total count of results returned.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Search Test 11:<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">keywords: +child +pornography +muslim<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Duckduckgo Results: News articles were returned (as expected).\u00a0 Duckduckgo does not give a total count of results returned.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Summary<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">I have just proved without a single doubt in anybody&#8217;s mind that Google in manipulating their search research based on the individual whims of the individual programmers at Google.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">One, Google has the ability to selectively remove ALL (and I mean 100%, not a single link showing) for search results that it does not politically agree with.\u00a0 When I searched for +child +pornography +muslim using Chrome and Google, I got zero results back. When I did the same search using the Opera browser and the search engine duckduckgo, I got search results back.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Two, Google has the ability to selectively change a search pattern to increase the chances that negative search results of their \u201cenemy&#8221; appear. \u00a0 When I searched for +child +pornography +Jewish, Google changed my search parameters to just child pornography Jewish. Google did not change the search parameters when I searched for either child pornography Christian or child pornography Muslim.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">So what does this all mean?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">It means that Google has the ability already in place, and has had it in place for over 6 months now (at least), to wipe out whole search results with a few keystrokes.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Would Google implement this for personal political gain? Let&#8217;s look at the evidence. Negative search results about Muslims, removed from existence from Google&#8217;s results.\u00a0 Negative search results about Jews, search criteria changed to return the maximum number of negative search results. And it is not standard procedure, because they left the search results for the keywords +child +pornography +Christians alone (returned results, but did not change the search criteria).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">So will Google use this programming to affect the 2020 election?\u00a0 There is a pro-Muslim and anti-Jewish bias written directly into Google software code.\u00a0 And it is not generic programming, because the Christian test was the control.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Trump moved the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, Trump set up travel bans from Muslim countries that are heavily involved in terrorism, and Trump is working to seal the US\u2019s borders.\u00a0 In other words, Trump is not the best friend of the whole Mulsim community. Not to mention the fact that videos have been released where the leaders of Google talk about definitely having plans to interfere in the 2020 election against Trump.\u00a0 These tests just prove that the software is in place and ready to go.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Is that illegal?\u00a0 Should it be illegal?\u00a0 I don&#8217;t know.\u00a0 Is the fact that Google receives money for foreign advertisers affect anything?\u00a0 Is the fact that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/\"><span class=\"s2\">Google<\/span><\/a> is an international company and directly getting involved in manipulating, what should be freely available knowledge to the public, affect anything?\u00a0 Again, I don&#8217;t know.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When somebody types in the search term into Google, for example, Jackpot Capital casino download, the person expects to get search results back that are relevant to their search. \u00a0 In an ideal world, the actual link to the actual downloadable file for the Jackpot Capital casino download should be the first item. But in &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/google-is-messing-with-search-results-and-it-can-be-proven\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Google is messing with search results and it can be proven&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=798"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":799,"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798\/revisions\/799"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unitedfinances.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}